beta Lyr (**)
|
| Name: |
beta Lyr, 10 Lyr |
| Type: |
** |
| Constellation: |
Lyr |
| Coordinates: |
18h50m04.79s / +33°21'45.60" |
| Components: |
|
|
m1 |
m2 |
ρ |
θ |
Year |
| STFA39 |
AB |
3m6 |
6m7 |
45.7" |
149° |
2017 |
| BU293 |
AE |
3m6 |
10m1 |
67.2" |
317° |
2015 |
| BU293 |
AF |
3m6 |
10m6 |
86.0" |
18° |
2015 |
|
|
|
|
| Robert Zebahl |
70mm f/5.7, 22x
At 22x and 57x the components A, B, E and F were easily seen. The B component appeared slightly bluish-silver at 22x, but at 57x the color was difficult to tell. All four components form a slightly curved 'Y' with the bright A component in the center.
|
|
102mm f/11, 62x, Bortle 6
Components A, B, E and F are easily visible. The two southern stars on the drawing do not belong to the system.
|
|
|
epsilon Lyr (**)
|
| Name: |
epsilon Lyr |
| Type: |
** |
| Constellation: |
Lyr |
| Coordinates: |
18h44m20.34s / +39°40'12.40" |
| Components: |
|
|
m1 |
m2 |
ρ |
θ |
Year |
| STFA37 |
AB-CD |
4m7 |
4m6 |
209.5" |
172° |
2016 |
| STFA37 |
AI |
5m2 |
10m1 |
149.5" |
137° |
2015 |
| STF2382, 4 Lyr, epsilon 1 Lyr |
AB |
5m2 |
6m1 |
2.2" |
346° |
2018 |
| STF2383, 5 Lyr, epsilon 2 Lyr |
CD |
5m2 |
5m4 |
2.4" |
75° |
2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Robert Zebahl |
55mm f/9.1, 59x
STF2382 (AB): At 42x slightly elongated, at 59x elongated and obviously notched.
|
|
55mm f/9.1, 59x
STF2383 (CD): At 42x clearly elongated, but without any visible notch. At 59x split with touching diffraction disks.
|
|
70mm f/5.7, 57x
STF2382 (AB): Obviously seen as figure '8'.
|
|
70mm f/5.7, 57x
STF2383 (CD): Split, but extremely tight with almost touching diffraction disks.
|
|
102mm f/11, 125x, Bortle 6, SQM-L 19.4
Stunning view of the components A-D and I!
|
|
|
SHJ 282 (**)
|
| Name: |
SHJ282 |
| Type: |
** |
| Constellation: |
Lyr |
| Coordinates: |
18h54m52.52s / +33°58'06.90" |
| Components: |
|
|
m1 |
m2 |
ρ |
θ |
Year |
|
AC |
6m1 |
7m6 |
45.4" |
350° |
2018 |
|
|
|
|
| Robert Zebahl |
70mm f/5.7, 22x, Bortle 6-, SQM-L 19.2
Fairly bright and wide pair. The double star was conspicuous, especially in regard to its color: A appeared orange, C rather grey-bluish. It could be observed together with Messier 57 and beta & gamma Lyrae. Very nice.
|
|
|
STF 2349 (**)
|
| Name: |
STF2349 |
| Type: |
** |
| Constellation: |
Lyr |
| Coordinates: |
18h36m37.34s / +33°28'08.50" |
| Components: |
|
|
m1 |
m2 |
ρ |
θ |
Year |
|
AB |
5m4 |
9m4 |
7.2" |
204° |
2016 |
|
|
|
|
| Robert Zebahl |
102mm f/11, 125x, Bortle 6
Easy to split with a clear difference in brightness. The companion only appeared as a tiny star.
|
|
|
STF 2351 (**)
|
| Name: |
STF2351 |
| Type: |
** |
| Constellation: |
Lyr |
| Coordinates: |
18h36m12.00s / +41°16'41.20" |
| Components: |
|
|
m1 |
m2 |
ρ |
θ |
Year |
|
|
7m6 |
7m6 |
5.0" |
160° |
2019 |
|
|
|
|
| Robert Zebahl |
70mm f/5.7, 57x
Beautiful, little double star with equally bright components at a moderate distance.
|
|
|
STF 2461 (**)
|
| Name: |
STF2461, 17 Lyr |
| Type: |
** |
| Constellation: |
Lyr |
| Coordinates: |
19h07m25.58s / +32°30'06.20" |
| Components: |
|
|
m1 |
m2 |
ρ |
θ |
Year |
|
AB |
5m3 |
9m1 |
3.2" |
281° |
2017 |
|
|
|
|
| Robert Zebahl |
152mm f/5.9, 129x, Bortle 6
At 129x clearly split. The B component was just visible as pretty faint, tiny star. At 270x much easier visible.
|
|
|
STF 2470 (**)
|
| Name: |
STF2470 |
| Type: |
** |
| Constellation: |
Lyr |
| Coordinates: |
19h08m45.20s / +34°45'37.10" |
| Components: |
|
|
m1 |
m2 |
ρ |
θ |
Year |
|
|
7m0 |
8m4 |
13.8" |
267° |
2017 |
|
|
|
|
| Robert Zebahl |
102mm f/11, 40x, Bortle 6, SQM-L 19.4
Striking, especially with STF 2474 in one visual field. The color of the components was not clearly visible. Worthwhile! Sketch see STF 2474.
|
|
|
STF 2474 (**)
|
| Name: |
STF2474 |
| Type: |
** |
| Constellation: |
Lyr |
| Coordinates: |
19h09m04.35s / +34°35'59.90" |
| Components: |
|
|
m1 |
m2 |
ρ |
θ |
Year |
|
AB |
6m8 |
7m9 |
15.9" |
264° |
2018 |
|
|
|
|
| Robert Zebahl |
102mm f/11, 40x, Bortle 6, SQM-L 19.4
Pretty conspicuous, easy double star. Especially attractive with the nearby double star STF 2470, as both are very similar in brightness, distance and position angle. The color of both components appeared slightly yellowish-orange.
|
|
|